manual: reorganize
This commit is contained in:
parent
2dcb3fa4bf
commit
dd15bef2e9
|
@ -3,6 +3,8 @@ of the GNU GPL v3.0 (or any later version), or under the [CC BY-SA 4.0][CC].
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
[CC]: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/legalcode
|
[CC]: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/legalcode
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
# Introduction
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
This document is aimed at maintainers of this software who are not
|
This document is aimed at maintainers of this software who are not
|
||||||
experienced programmers (in either software or hardware). Its goal is
|
experienced programmers (in either software or hardware). Its goal is
|
||||||
to contain any pertinent information to the devlopment process of Upsilon.
|
to contain any pertinent information to the devlopment process of Upsilon.
|
||||||
|
@ -11,7 +13,18 @@ You do not need to read and digest the entire manual in sequence. Many
|
||||||
things will seem confusing and counterintuitive, and will require some time
|
things will seem confusing and counterintuitive, and will require some time
|
||||||
to properly understand.
|
to properly understand.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
# Required Knowledge
|
## Organization of the Project
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
Upsilon uses LiteX and ZephyrOS for it's FPGA code. LiteX generates HDL
|
||||||
|
and glues it together. It also forms the build system of the hardware
|
||||||
|
portion of Upsilon. ZephyrOS is the kernel portion, which deals with
|
||||||
|
communication between the computer that receives scan data and the
|
||||||
|
hardware that is executing the scan.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
LiteX further uses F4PGA to compile the HDL code. F4PGA is primarily
|
||||||
|
made up of Yosys (synthesis) and nextpnr (place and route).
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
## Required Knowledge
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
Verilog is critical for writing hardware. You should hopefully not have
|
Verilog is critical for writing hardware. You should hopefully not have
|
||||||
to write much of it.
|
to write much of it.
|
||||||
|
@ -37,92 +50,6 @@ You do not need to know a lot about migen, but LiteX's documentation
|
||||||
is poor so you will need to know some migen in order to read the
|
is poor so you will need to know some migen in order to read the
|
||||||
code and understand how some modules work.
|
code and understand how some modules work.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
# FPGA Concepts
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
Upsilon runs on a Field Programmable Gate Array (FPGA). FPGAs are sets
|
|
||||||
of logic gates and other peripherals that can be changed by a computer.
|
|
||||||
FPGAs can implement CPUs, digital filters, and control code at a much
|
|
||||||
higher speed than a computer. The downside is that FPGAs are much more
|
|
||||||
difficult to program for.
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
A large part of Upsilon is written in Verilog. Verilog is a Hardware
|
|
||||||
Description Language (HDL), which is similar to a programming language
|
|
||||||
(such as C++ or Python).
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
The difference is, is that Verilog compiles to a *piece of hardware* that
|
|
||||||
deals with individual bits executing operations in sync with a clock. This
|
|
||||||
differs from a *piece of software*, which is a set of instructions that a
|
|
||||||
computer follows. Verilog is usually much less abstract than regular code.
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
Regular code is tested on the system in which it is run. Hardware,
|
|
||||||
on the other hand, is very difficult to test on the device that it
|
|
||||||
is actually running on. Hardware is usually *simulated*. This project
|
|
||||||
primarily simulates Verilog code using the program Verilator, where the
|
|
||||||
code that runs the simulation is written in C++.
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
Instead of strings, integers, and classes, the basic components of all
|
|
||||||
Verilog code is the wire and the register, which store bits (1 and 0).
|
|
||||||
Wires connect components together, and registers store data, in a similar
|
|
||||||
way to variables in software. Unlike usual programming languages, where
|
|
||||||
code executes one step at a time, most FPGA code runs at the tick of
|
|
||||||
the system clock in parallel.
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
To compile Verilog to a format suitable for execution on an FPGA, you
|
|
||||||
*synthesize* the Verilog into a low-level format that uses the specific
|
|
||||||
resources of the FPGA you are using, and then you run a *place and route*
|
|
||||||
program to allocate resources on the FPGA to fit your design. Running
|
|
||||||
synthesis on its own can help you understand how much resources a module
|
|
||||||
uses. Place-and-route gives you *timing reports*, which tell you about
|
|
||||||
major design problems that outstrip the capabilities of the FPGA (or the
|
|
||||||
programs you are using). You should look up what "timing" on an FPGA is
|
|
||||||
and learn as much as you can about it, because it is an issue that does
|
|
||||||
not happen in standard software and can be very difficult to fix when
|
|
||||||
you run into it.
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
Once a bitstream is synthesized, it is loaded onto a FPGA through a cable
|
|
||||||
(for this project, openFPGALoader).
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
## Recommendations to Learners
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
[Gisselquist Technology][GT] is the best free online resource for FPGA
|
|
||||||
programming out there. These articles will help you understand how to
|
|
||||||
write *good* FPGA code, not just valid code.
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
[GT]: https://zipcpu.com/
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
Here are some exercises for you to ease yourself into FPGA programming.
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
* Write an FPGA program that implements addition without using the `+`
|
|
||||||
operator. This program should add each number bit by bit, handling
|
|
||||||
carried digits properly. This is called a *full adder*.
|
|
||||||
* Write an FPGA program that multiplies two signed integers together,
|
|
||||||
without using the `*` operator. The width of these integers should
|
|
||||||
not be hard-coded: it should be easy to change. What you write in
|
|
||||||
this is something that is actually a part of this project: see
|
|
||||||
`boothmul.v`. You do not (and should not!) write it just like Upsilon
|
|
||||||
has written it.
|
|
||||||
* Write an FPGA program that communicates over SPI. For simplicity,
|
|
||||||
you only need to write it for a single SPI mode: look up on the internet
|
|
||||||
for details. There is an SPI slave device in this repository that you
|
|
||||||
can use to simulate an end for the SPI master you write, but you should
|
|
||||||
write the SPI slave yourself. For bonus points, connect your SPI master
|
|
||||||
to a real SPI device and confirm that your communication works.
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
For each of these exercises, follow the complete "Design Testing Process"
|
|
||||||
below. At the very least, write simulations and test your programs on
|
|
||||||
real hardware.
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
# Organization
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
Upsilon uses LiteX and ZephyrOS for it's FPGA code. LiteX generates HDL
|
|
||||||
and glues it together. It also forms the build system of the hardware
|
|
||||||
portion of Upsilon. ZephyrOS is the kernel portion, which deals with
|
|
||||||
communication between the computer that receives scan data and the
|
|
||||||
hardware that is executing the scan.
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
LiteX further uses F4PGA to compile the HDL code. F4PGA is primarily
|
|
||||||
made up of Yosys (synthesis) and nextpnr (place and route).
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
# Compile Process
|
# Compile Process
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
Although each component uses a different build system, you can run everything
|
Although each component uses a different build system, you can run everything
|
||||||
|
@ -271,9 +198,84 @@ In the root of the TFTP server, have `boot.bin` be the kernel binary
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
[owrt_wiki]: https://openwrt.org/docs/guide-user/troubleshooting/tftpserver
|
[owrt_wiki]: https://openwrt.org/docs/guide-user/troubleshooting/tftpserver
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
# Design Testing Process
|
# FPGA
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
## Simulation
|
Upsilon runs on a Field Programmable Gate Array (FPGA). FPGAs are sets
|
||||||
|
of logic gates and other peripherals that can be changed by a computer.
|
||||||
|
FPGAs can implement CPUs, digital filters, and control code at a much
|
||||||
|
higher speed than a computer. The downside is that FPGAs are much more
|
||||||
|
difficult to program for.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
A large part of Upsilon is written in Verilog. Verilog is a Hardware
|
||||||
|
Description Language (HDL), which is similar to a programming language
|
||||||
|
(such as C++ or Python).
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
The difference is, is that Verilog compiles to a *piece of hardware* that
|
||||||
|
deals with individual bits executing operations in sync with a clock. This
|
||||||
|
differs from a *piece of software*, which is a set of instructions that a
|
||||||
|
computer follows. Verilog is usually much less abstract than regular code.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
Regular code is tested on the system in which it is run. Hardware,
|
||||||
|
on the other hand, is very difficult to test on the device that it
|
||||||
|
is actually running on. Hardware is usually *simulated*. This project
|
||||||
|
primarily simulates Verilog code using the program Verilator, where the
|
||||||
|
code that runs the simulation is written in C++.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
Instead of strings, integers, and classes, the basic components of all
|
||||||
|
Verilog code is the wire and the register, which store bits (1 and 0).
|
||||||
|
Wires connect components together, and registers store data, in a similar
|
||||||
|
way to variables in software. Unlike usual programming languages, where
|
||||||
|
code executes one step at a time, most FPGA code runs at the tick of
|
||||||
|
the system clock in parallel.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
To compile Verilog to a format suitable for execution on an FPGA, you
|
||||||
|
*synthesize* the Verilog into a low-level format that uses the specific
|
||||||
|
resources of the FPGA you are using, and then you run a *place and route*
|
||||||
|
program to allocate resources on the FPGA to fit your design. Running
|
||||||
|
synthesis on its own can help you understand how much resources a module
|
||||||
|
uses. Place-and-route gives you *timing reports*, which tell you about
|
||||||
|
major design problems that outstrip the capabilities of the FPGA (or the
|
||||||
|
programs you are using). You should look up what "timing" on an FPGA is
|
||||||
|
and learn as much as you can about it, because it is an issue that does
|
||||||
|
not happen in standard software and can be very difficult to fix when
|
||||||
|
you run into it.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
Once a bitstream is synthesized, it is loaded onto a FPGA through a cable
|
||||||
|
(for this project, openFPGALoader).
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
## Recommendations to Learners
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
[Gisselquist Technology][GT] is the best free online resource for FPGA
|
||||||
|
programming out there. These articles will help you understand how to
|
||||||
|
write *good* FPGA code, not just valid code.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
[GT]: https://zipcpu.com/
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
Here are some exercises for you to ease yourself into FPGA programming.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
* Write an FPGA program that implements addition without using the `+`
|
||||||
|
operator. This program should add each number bit by bit, handling
|
||||||
|
carried digits properly. This is called a *full adder*.
|
||||||
|
* Write an FPGA program that multiplies two signed integers together,
|
||||||
|
without using the `*` operator. The width of these integers should
|
||||||
|
not be hard-coded: it should be easy to change. What you write in
|
||||||
|
this is something that is actually a part of this project: see
|
||||||
|
`boothmul.v`. You do not (and should not!) write it just like Upsilon
|
||||||
|
has written it.
|
||||||
|
* Write an FPGA program that communicates over SPI. For simplicity,
|
||||||
|
you only need to write it for a single SPI mode: look up on the internet
|
||||||
|
for details. There is an SPI slave device in this repository that you
|
||||||
|
can use to simulate an end for the SPI master you write, but you should
|
||||||
|
write the SPI slave yourself. For bonus points, connect your SPI master
|
||||||
|
to a real SPI device and confirm that your communication works.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
For each of these exercises, follow the complete "Design Testing Process"
|
||||||
|
below. At the very least, write simulations and test your programs on
|
||||||
|
real hardware.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
## Design Testing Process
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
### Simulation
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
When you write or modify a verilog module, the first thing you should do
|
When you write or modify a verilog module, the first thing you should do
|
||||||
is write/run a simulation of that module. A simulation of that module
|
is write/run a simulation of that module. A simulation of that module
|
||||||
|
@ -311,7 +313,7 @@ Verilog only.** See `firmware/rtl/waveform/waveform_sim.v` and
|
||||||
`firmware/rtl/waveform/dma_sim.v` for an example of Verilog files only
|
`firmware/rtl/waveform/dma_sim.v` for an example of Verilog files only
|
||||||
used for tests.
|
used for tests.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
## Test Synthesis
|
### Test Synthesis
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
**Yosys only accepts a subset of Verilog. You might write a bunch of
|
**Yosys only accepts a subset of Verilog. You might write a bunch of
|
||||||
code that Verilator will happily simulate but that will fail to go
|
code that Verilator will happily simulate but that will fail to go
|
||||||
|
@ -333,7 +335,7 @@ the current limitations that F4PGA has. The file `xc7.f4pga.tcl` that
|
||||||
F4PGA downloads is the complete synthesis script, read it to understand
|
F4PGA downloads is the complete synthesis script, read it to understand
|
||||||
the internals of what F4PGA does to compile your verilog.
|
the internals of what F4PGA does to compile your verilog.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
## Test Compilation
|
### Test Compilation
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
I haven't been able to do this for most of this project. The basic idea
|
I haven't been able to do this for most of this project. The basic idea
|
||||||
is to use `firmware/rtl/soc.py` to load only the module to test, and
|
is to use `firmware/rtl/soc.py` to load only the module to test, and
|
||||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue