because they do the same.
We only may want a separate fw_bandwidth_modify() in the future when
firewire-core gains a special ioctl() for that.
(Not runtime-tested, but it looks good to me.)
Signed-off-by: Stefan Richter <stefanr@s5r6.in-berlin.de>
Signed-off-by: Dan Dennedy <dan@dennedy.org>
(juju)
Reported by Adrian Knoth: fw_channel_modify() was unable to allocate
some channels which were actually free.
http://marc.info/?l=linux1394-devel&t=122818128900002
This can be easily fixed by replacing fw_channel_modify() by
ieee1394_channel_modify() because this is highlevel enough to work with
Juju as well. We only may want a separate fw_channel_modify() in the
future when firewire-core gains a special ioctl() for that.
Also fix a documentation typo: raw1394_channel_modify() did not show up
in extracted API documentation due to a cut'n'paste typo in raw1394.h.
Signed-off-by: Stefan Richter <stefanr@s5r6.in-berlin.de>
Signed-off-by: Dan Dennedy <dan@dennedy.org>
The ieee1394 version of raw1394_read_cycle_timer() fell over the cliff
in "First cut at integrating juju". This brings it back and adds a juju
version of it.
Also correct a typo in the inline documentation: s/get/read/
Stefan Richter
Dan Dennedy