srfi-228 - SRFI-228 for Chicken

	Commit message (Collapse)	Author	Age	Files	Lines
*	Delete old examples, note that new ones are needed	Daphne Preston-Kendal	2021-12-29	1	-23/+4
\|
*	Edit exports to match the new procedures and names	Daphne Preston-Kendal	2021-12-29	1	-4/+3
\|
*	Merge branch 'master' of github.com:dpk/srfi-228	Daphne Preston-Kendal	2021-12-29	3	-5/+111
\|\
\| *	Publish first draft.draft-1	Arthur A. Gleckler	2021-08-31	3	-3/+107
\| \|
\| *	Note places where examples are needed.	Arthur A. Gleckler	2021-08-31	1	-0/+2
\| \|
\| *	copy edit	Arthur A. Gleckler	2021-08-30	1	-1/+1
\| \|
\| *	Fix errors reported by W3C HTML Validator.	Arthur A. Gleckler	2021-08-30	1	-2/+2
\| \|
\| *	Link to the sample implementation.	Arthur A. Gleckler	2021-08-30	1	-1/+1
\| \|
* \|	Express hope for a iteration solution	Daphne Preston-Kendal	2021-12-29	1	-1/+3
\| \|
* \|	Add make-sum-comparator and use the term ‘product comparator’ more	Daphne Preston-Kendal	2021-12-29	2	-2/+43
\| \|
* \|	Nix compose-comparator syntax, rename composed to product comparator	Daphne Preston-Kendal	2021-12-29	2	-29/+2
\|/
*	it’s an SRFI	Daphne Preston-Kendal	2021-08-28	5	-94/+164
\|
*	Fix a Markdown delimiter in the wrong place.	Daphne Preston-Kendal	2021-04-02	1	-1/+1
\|
*	Remove the stuff about performance, which isn’t necessarily true.	Daphne Preston-Kendal	2021-04-02	1	-1/+1
\| \| \| \|	It isn’t true in the sample implementation, for instance.
*	Fix a stylistic weirdness in code for composed comparator ordering.	Daphne Preston-Kendal	2021-04-02	1	-1/+1
\|
*	Note that the SRFI number isn’t formally assigned yet.	Daphne Preston-Kendal	2021-04-02	1	-1/+2
\|
*	Add draft of sample implementation.	Daphne Preston-Kendal	2021-04-02	2	-0/+67
\|
*	Use ‘wrap’ and not ‘box’, as suggested by jcowan.	Daphne Preston-Kendal	2021-04-02	1	-5/+5
\|
*	Initial commit	Daphne Preston-Kendal	2021-03-31	1	-0/+85