docs/how: update

Signed-off-by: Unai Martinez-Corral <umartinezcorral@antmicro.com>
This commit is contained in:
Unai Martinez-Corral 2022-03-16 01:13:02 +01:00
parent 3f08ecd9e7
commit b200a0e6cd
4 changed files with 4001 additions and 44 deletions

File diff suppressed because one or more lines are too long

Before

Width:  |  Height:  |  Size: 66 KiB

After

Width:  |  Height:  |  Size: 44 KiB

File diff suppressed because one or more lines are too long

Before

Width:  |  Height:  |  Size: 102 KiB

After

Width:  |  Height:  |  Size: 186 KiB

View File

@ -140,6 +140,7 @@ man_pages = [
intersphinx_mapping = {
"python": ("https://docs.python.org/3/", None),
"arch-defs": ("https://f4pga.readthedocs.io/projects/arch-defs/en/latest/", None),
"interchange": ("https://fpga-interchange-schema.readthedocs.io/", None),
"fasm": ("https://fasm.readthedocs.io/en/latest/", None),
"prjtrellis": ("https://prjtrellis.readthedocs.io/en/latest/", None),
"prjxray": ("https://f4pga.readthedocs.io/projects/prjxray/en/latest/", None),

View File

@ -3,65 +3,66 @@ How it works
To understand how F4PGA works, it is best to start with an overview of the general EDA tooling ecosystem and then
proceed to see what the F4PGA project consists of.
For both ASIC- and FPGA-oriented EDA tooling, there are three major areas that the workflows need to cover: description,
frontend and backend.
EDA Tooling Ecosystem
=====================
.. image:: _static/images/EDA.svg
:align: center
For both ASIC- and FPGA-oriented EDA tooling, there are three major areas that
the workflow needs to cover: hardware description, frontend and backend.
Hardware description languages are generally open, with both established HDLs
such as Verilog and VHDL and emerging software-inspired paradigms like
`Chisel <https://chisel.eecs.berkeley.edu/>`_,
`SpinalHDL <https://spinalhdl.github.io/SpinalDoc-RTD/>`_ or
`Migen <https://m-labs.hk/gateware/migen/>`_.
The major problem lies however in the front- and backend, where previously
there was no established standard, vendor-neutral tooling that would cover
all the necessary components for an end-to-end flow.
This pertains both to ASIC and FPGA workflows, although F4PGA focuses
on the latter (some parts of F4PGA will also be useful in the former).
.. figure:: _static/images/EDA.svg
Project structure
=================
Hardware description languages are either established (such as Verilog and `VHDL ➚ <https://IEEE-P1076.gitlab.io/>`__) or
emerging software-inspired paradigms like
`Chisel ➚ <https://chisel.eecs.berkeley.edu/>`_,
`SpinalHDL ➚ <https://spinalhdl.github.io/SpinalDoc-RTD/>`_,
`Migen ➚ <https://m-labs.hk/gateware/migen/>`_, or
:gh:`Amaranth ➚ <amaranth-lang>`.
Since early 2000s, free and open source tools allow simulating HDLs.
However, for several decades the major problem lied in the frontend and backend, where there was no established
standard vendor-neutral tooling that would cover all the necessary components for an end-to-end flow.
This pertains both to ASIC and FPGA workflows.
Although F4PGA focuses on the latter, some parts of F4PGA will also be useful in the former.
To achieve F4PGA's goal of a complete FOSS FPGA toolchain, a number of tools and projects are necessary to provide all
the needed components of an end-to-end flow.
Thus, F4PGA serves as an umbrella project for several activities, the central of which pertains to the creation of
so-called FPGA "architecture definitions", i.e. documentation of how specific FPGAs work internally.
More information can be found in the :doc:`F4PGA Architecture Definitions <arch-defs:index>` project.
The F4PGA toolchains consist of logic synthesis and implementation tools, as well as chip documentation projects for
chips of various vendors.
Thus, F4PGA serves as an umbrella project for several activities.
Those definitions and serve as input to backend tools like :gh:`nextpnr <YosysHQ/nextpnr>` and `Verilog to Routing <https://verilogtorouting.org/>`_,
and frontend tools like `Yosys <http://www.clifford.at/yosys/>`_.
.. image:: _static/images/parts.svg
:align: center
The central resources are the so-called FPGA "architecture definitions" (i.e. documentation of how specific FPGAs work
internally) and the "interchange schema" (for logical and physical netlists).
Those definitions serve as input to frontend and backend tools, such as
`Yosys ➚ <http://www.clifford.at/yosys/>`__,
:gh:`nextpnr ➚ <YosysHQ/nextpnr>` and `Verilog to Routing ➚ <https://verilogtorouting.org/>`_.
They are created within separate collaborating projects targeting different FPGAs:
* :doc:`Project X-Ray <prjxray:index>` for Xilinx 7-Series
* `Project IceStorm <http://www.clifford.at/icestorm/>` for Lattice iCE40
* :doc:`Project Trellis <prjtrellis:index>` for Lattice ECP5 FPGAs
* :doc:`Project X-Ray <prjxray:index>` for Xilinx 7-Series
* `Project IceStorm ➚ <http://www.clifford.at/icestorm/>`__ for Lattice iCE40
* :doc:`Project Trellis <prjtrellis:index>` for Lattice ECP5 FPGAs
.. figure:: _static/images/parts.svg
More information can be found at :doc:`F4PGA Architecture Definitions ➚ <arch-defs:index>` and :doc:`FPGA Interchange ➚ <interchange:index>`.
The F4PGA toolchain consists of logic synthesis and implementation tools, as well as chip documentation projects for
chips of various vendors.
To prepare a working bitstream for a particular FPGA chip, the toolchain goes through the following stages:
* First, a description of the FPGA chip is created with the information from the relevant bitstream documentation
* A description of the FPGA chip is created with the information from the relevant bitstream documentation
project.
This part is done within the :gh:`F4PGA Architecture Definitions <chipsalliance/f4pga-arch-defs>`.
This part is done within the :gh:`F4PGA Architecture Definitions <chipsalliance/f4pga-arch-defs>`.
The project prepares information about the timings and resources available in the chip needed at the implementation
stage, as well as techmaps for the synthesis tools.
* The second step is logic synthesis.
It is carried out in the Yosys framework, which expresses the input Verilog file by means of the block and connection
types available in the chosen chip.
.. NOTE::
This stage is typically pre-built and installed as assets.
However, developers contributing to the bitstream documentation might build it.
* Then, logic synthesis is carried out in the `Yosys ➚ <http://www.clifford.at/yosys/>`__ framework, which expresses the
user-provided hardware description by means of the block and connection types available in the chosen chip.
* The next step is implementation.
Placement and routing tools put individual blocks from the synthesis description in the specific chip locations and
create paths between them.
To do that, F4PGA uses either :gh:`nextpnr <YosysHQ/nextpnr>` or `Verilog to Routing :gh:<verilog-to-routing/vtr-verilog-to-routing>`.
Placement and routing tools put individual blocks from the synthesis description in specific chip locations and create
paths between them.
To do that, F4PGA uses either :gh:`nextpnr ➚ <YosysHQ/nextpnr>` or :gh:`Verilog to Routing ➚ <verilog-to-routing/vtr-verilog-to-routing>`.
* Finally, the design properties are translated into a set of features available in the given FPGA chip.
These features are saved in the :gh:`fasm format <chipsalliance/fasm>`, which is developed as part of F4PGA.
The fasm file is then translated to bitstream using the information from the bitstream documentation projects.
These features are saved in the :gh:`FASM format ➚ <chipsalliance/fasm>`, which is developed as part of F4PGA.
The FASM file is then translated to a bitstream, using the information from the bitstream documentation projects.