mirror of
https://github.com/enjoy-digital/litex.git
synced 2025-01-04 09:52:26 -05:00
sdram: remove redundant with_l2 parameter (equivalent to l2_size != 0)
This commit is contained in:
parent
be20fbabe4
commit
b313772a0c
2 changed files with 3 additions and 4 deletions
|
@ -9,14 +9,13 @@ from misoclib.mem.sdram.core.lasmicon.multiplexer import *
|
||||||
class LASMIconSettings:
|
class LASMIconSettings:
|
||||||
def __init__(self, req_queue_size=8,
|
def __init__(self, req_queue_size=8,
|
||||||
read_time=32, write_time=16,
|
read_time=32, write_time=16,
|
||||||
with_l2=True, l2_size=8192,
|
l2_size=8192,
|
||||||
with_bandwidth=False,
|
with_bandwidth=False,
|
||||||
with_memtest=False,
|
with_memtest=False,
|
||||||
with_refresh=True):
|
with_refresh=True):
|
||||||
self.req_queue_size = req_queue_size
|
self.req_queue_size = req_queue_size
|
||||||
self.read_time = read_time
|
self.read_time = read_time
|
||||||
self.write_time = write_time
|
self.write_time = write_time
|
||||||
self.with_l2 = with_l2
|
|
||||||
self.l2_size = l2_size
|
self.l2_size = l2_size
|
||||||
if with_memtest:
|
if with_memtest:
|
||||||
self.with_bandwidth = True
|
self.with_bandwidth = True
|
||||||
|
|
|
@ -53,8 +53,8 @@ class SDRAMSoC(SoC):
|
||||||
self.submodules.memtest_w = memtest.MemtestWriter(self.sdram.crossbar.get_master())
|
self.submodules.memtest_w = memtest.MemtestWriter(self.sdram.crossbar.get_master())
|
||||||
self.submodules.memtest_r = memtest.MemtestReader(self.sdram.crossbar.get_master())
|
self.submodules.memtest_r = memtest.MemtestReader(self.sdram.crossbar.get_master())
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
if self.sdram_controller_settings.with_l2:
|
l2_size = self.sdram_controller_settings.l2_size
|
||||||
l2_size = self.sdram_controller_settings.l2_size
|
if l2_size != 0:
|
||||||
# XXX Vivado 2014.X workaround, Vivado is not able to map correctly our L2 cache.
|
# XXX Vivado 2014.X workaround, Vivado is not able to map correctly our L2 cache.
|
||||||
# Issue is reported to Xilinx and should be fixed in next releases (2015.1?).
|
# Issue is reported to Xilinx and should be fixed in next releases (2015.1?).
|
||||||
# Remove this workaround when fixed by Xilinx.
|
# Remove this workaround when fixed by Xilinx.
|
||||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in a new issue